U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reintegrative Shaming, Republicanism, and Policy (From Crime and Public Policy: Putting Theory to Work, P 191-205, 1995, Hugh D Barlow, ed. - See NCJ-163416)

NCJ Number
163427
Author(s)
J Braithwaite
Date Published
1995
Length
15 pages
Annotation
The theory of reintegrative shaming is examined with respect to its implications for the explanation of crime, its relationship to republican political theory, and its application to crime prevention.
Abstract
The central idea of reintegrative shaming they is that some societies have higher crime rates than others because their citizens less effectively shame criminal behavior. Reintegrative shaming involves disapproval while sustaining a relationship of respect, ceremonies to certify deviance terminated by ceremonies to decertify deviance, disapproval of the evil deed without labeling the person as evil, and deviance not allowed to become a master status trait. Reintegrative shaming differs from stigmatization in crucial aspects. Reintegrative shaming theory is likely to be politically harmful unless combined with a normative theory of when it is right to apply it. Braithwaite and Pettit's republican theory of criminal justice describes the conditions under which shaming is right or wrong. This theory motivates communitarian rather than governmental solutions to crime problems. Forms of communitarianism that can focus moral energies and reduce crime in the automobile age are social movement politics and the individual-centered communitarianism of the New Zealand Maori idea of family group conferences. 39 references