The first study involved an analysis of 2,043 court records to identify factors related to adjudication decisions in juvenile delinquency cases. Data consisted of information on a random selection of juveniles who had committed delinquent crimes in 1993. The first study showed that whites were more likely than blacks to admit committing the crime. After controlling for this finding and other legal factors, race did not have a significant effect. The second study used a questionnaire that consisted of brief case scenarios of three juveniles: one accused of motor vehicle theft, one accused of simple battery on a high school teacher, and one accused of cocaine possession with intent to distribute. In this study, 67 judges, 53 probation officers, and 126 court service workers made adjudication and disposition decisions about the three juveniles in experimental simulations in which juvenile race, length of prior record, and reaction to the crime (admitting or denying it) were systematically manipulated. Consistent with the first archival study, juveniles who admitted committing their offense were treated more severely than juveniles who denied committing their offense. Type of crime committed and juvenile legal history were significant predictors of adjudication and disposition decisions. More specifically, the drug crime was judged to be more serious than theft and battery, and juveniles with legal histories received more serious adjudications and dispositions than did juveniles with no prior records. Possible reasons are discussed for why admitting a crime leads to more punishment. 25 references and 3 tables