U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Hostage-Takings: a.k.a. (Also Known As) Forcible Confinements and Sexual Assaults: What the National Investigations Tell Us

NCJ Number
166544
Author(s)
T Nouwens
Date Published
1995
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This paper analyzes the findings of national boards of investigation that examined eight hostage-takings in Canadian correctional settings from April 1993 to March 1995; these eight were selected for study because they all involved the intent or the act of sexual assault against a hostage.
Abstract
Data are provided on the circumstances of the hostage- takings, offender and hostage profiles, and an analysis of the issues with a view toward developing policies and practices that will help prevent such incidents. Findings show that most often a male inmate will take a female staff member hostage. Even though sexual assault may not be the initial motive for the hostage- taking, an assault may occur as the hostage-taker finds he is in total control of the hostage and the situation. Most often the hostage-taker has a history of sexual offending. Staff most at risk for being taken hostage are female, non-correctional staff who are working alone or almost alone in areas accessible to inmates. The demands made by the hostage-taker in such incidents are vague and are often made late into the incident. Most often demands involve the offender wanting to talk to a particular staff member. Preventive measures should include ensuring the presence of other staff, security staff in particular, in areas where staff are required to work; ensuring there are enough portable personal alarms (PPA's) for staff who need them, and ensuring that staff wear their PPA's. All staff, particularly non-correctional staff, should be trained in what to do if they or a colleague are taken hostage. Once an incident has begun, responses may be improved by learning to define the situation accurately as a forcible confinement and potential sexual assault and then responding to the incident according to this definition.