U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Pretrial Urine Testing: Implications for Drug Courts From a Decade's Positive Experience

NCJ Number
167033
Journal
On Balance Dated: (Spring 1996) Pages: 2-3
Author(s)
J A Carver
Date Published
1996
Length
2 pages
Annotation
The District of Columbia's drug court system has been operating successfully for several years; its experience suggests that the approach of regular drug testing, immediate sanctions, strong case management, and the personal involvement of the judge is effective in the short run.
Abstract
The program uses elements of the December 1995 directive of the President, which called for pre-arraignment drug testing of arrestees in the Federal court system followed by routine drug testing as a condition of release. One of the approaches being evaluated in the District of Columbia is the use of immediate and graduated sanctions for positive drug tests or missed appointments. Felony drug defendants with drug abuse problems are ordered into twice-weekly drug testing as a condition of release. If they continue to test positive, they are encouraged to join the sanctions program. The judge makes clear that they will continue to be drug tested until sentencing and that they are unlikely to receive a probationary sentence if they are testing positive. Those who join the program experience a series of escalating consequences for violations. Preliminary data from the program reveal that most participants are in compliance with all program requirements; few reach the fourth or fifth level of sanctions. Although some defendants fail, unexpected and encouraging results have occurred. The initial results are promising; long-term effectiveness will undoubtedly depend on continued court pressure and aftercare.

Downloads

No download available

Availability