skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 175429 Find in a Library
Title: LEAD: A Boot Camp and Intensive Parole Program; the Final Impact Evaluation
Corporate Author: California Dept of the Youth Authority
United States of America
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 155
Sponsoring Agency: California Dept of the Youth Authority
Sacramento, CA 95823
Sale Source: California Dept of the Youth Authority
4241 Williamsborough Drive
Sacramento, CA 95823
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is the fifth and final legislatively mandated evaluation report on LEAD, the California Youth Authority's (CYA) pilot juvenile boot camp and intensive parole program.
Abstract: Designed as an alternative placement for the CYA's least serious offenders, LEAD is typical of other juvenile boot camps around the country in targeting cost effectiveness, bed savings, and lower rates of recidivism as major goals and in incorporating a primary focus on treatment. Named in its enabling legislation, LEAD stands for the qualities it expects to instill: leadership, esteem, ability, and discipline. The overall LEAD program is designed for 10 months. The outcome findings for this final impact evaluation are based on all wards who were subjected to random assignment to study groups (LEAD and control) during the first two years of LEAD operation (from September 1992 through August 1994). The LEAD group numbered 348 and the control group 284. In addition to evaluating the LEAD program's impact on recidivism, bed savings and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. The analyses of recidivism data show that criminal activity over the 12-month follow-up period did not differ significantly between the two groups, nor did offense severity. LEAD parolees were arrested more often, particularly for technical offenses, and were more often placed in detention (including revocations for technical offenses) than control parolees. The shorter initial length of stay for LEAD wards (by 4.2 months) resulted in an estimated saving of 126 beds per year. This resulted in a mean marginal cost saving of $1,516,410. Based on marginal cost figures, the cost of LEAD for the 1995-96 fiscal year was $463,842. 12 tables, 39 references, and appended legislation and supplementary tables and figures
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness
Index Term(s): California; Intensive supervision programs; Intermediate sanctions; Parole supervision; Shock incarceration programs
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=175429

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.