U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reconsidering Restorative Justice: The Corruption of Benevolence Revisited?

NCJ Number
176209
Journal
Crime and Delinquency Volume: 45 Issue: 1 Dated: January 1999 Pages: 3-27
Author(s)
S Levrant; F T Cullen; B Fulton; J F Wozniak
Date Published
1999
Length
25 pages
Annotation
The increasingly popular concept of restorative justice is receiving support from both conservatives and liberals, although considering the approach presents two types of problems.
Abstract
Restorative justice in its purest form is an informal approach to the criminal law that focuses on ways to repair social relationships disrupted by crime. It tries to hold offenders accountable through both shaming and reintegration processes in hopes of strengthening community bonds and providing victims with an opportunity to regain their personal power. It is not yet clear whether restorative justice will prove to be the progressive reform that liberals believe it is. First, the risk exists that restorative justice programs will be corrupted to serve nonprogressive goals and thus do more harm than good. Second, restorative justice programs are unlikely to have a meaningful effect on recidivism, based on current knowledge about changing offender behavior. Thus, restorative justice should be regarded and implemented with caution; its proponents should not oversell this intervention or overlook its potential problems. A alternative approach would be to explore bringing together the ideals of restorative justice and rehabilitation so that rehabilitation were regarded as part of a process that held offenders accountable and tried to restore victims. 87 references (Author abstract modified)