skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 190110 Find in a Library
Title: Amending Young Justice Policy in Canada: Discourse, Mediation and Ambiguity
Journal: Howard Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:40  Issue:3  Dated:August 2001  Pages:272-284
Author(s): Kathryn Campbell; Martin Dufresne; Richard Maclure
Editor(s): Tony Fowles; David Wilson
Date Published: August 2001
Page Count: 13
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article examined criticisms of the Canadian Young Offenders Act (YOA) of 1984 and the passage of Bill C-37 (amendments to the YOA) and their inability to reduce and mediate diverse discourse concerning youth crime and youth justice in Canada.
Abstract: In 1984, the Canadian Youth Offenders Act (YOA) was passed and considered a revolutionary piece of legislation. Yet, with increases in youth crime much criticism was generated from the public towards the Federal Government’s YOA. In response to the criticisms, successive Federal Governments introduced three sets of amendments (Bill C-37) to the YOA since its initial passage. However, these amendments did little to reduce confusion and discord concerning youth justice policy in Canada. In this article, three facets of mediated discourse were notable in the Bill C-37 hearings, the language of rationalization, the language of polarization, and the language of over-simplification. The Canadian parliamentary hearings on Bill C-37 exemplified the Federal Government’s mediation of diverse discourses on youth justice issues. The hearings were structured to foster dialogue and shared understanding among those having a stake in the YOA. The hearings served to facilitate the passage of the proposed YOA amendments into law in 1995. Noted in the article was the articulation of words and concepts in the discursive process that did little to reduce the ambiguity and contradictions of the YOA. The language of rationalization, polarization, and over-simplification were seen as possibly contributing to the passage of Bill C-37, but it did not resolve the confusion, dissension, and widespread frustration that continued to surround youth justice policy in Canada. In conclusion, it was questionable whether mediated discourse, an integral piece to policy formulation, had any significance on the implementation of Canadian youth justice policy. References
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice policies
Index Term(s): Canada; Federal legislation; Juvenile crime patterns; Juvenile delinquency; Legislation; Legislative impact
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.