skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 191095 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Psychology Reports in the NSW Department of Juvenile Justice Program: An Analysis of Their Effectiveness
Journal: Youth Studies Australia  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:June 2001  Pages:35-39
Author(s): C. J. Lennings; John Stephenson; Michael Cotter; Ingrid Johnston; Tony Jenkins
Date Published: June 2001
Page Count: 5
Publisher: http://www.acys.info/ysa 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This article addresses the effectiveness of psychology reports in the juvenile justice system in Australia.
Abstract: One area of increasing importance in the juvenile justice system is the pretrial or presentence screening of offenders undertaken by forensic psychologists. Such pre-screening should make a difference to the disposition of the child, and should pick up any underlying mental health needs. However, the psychological report has been criticized for being both inappropriate in content and style for the intended reader and for failing to make a substantial contribution to treatment planning for the offender. This study sought to assess the effects of psychological reports on sentencing outcomes. The data was derived from the first 100 reports prepared by the psychologists employed in the forensic program of the New South Wales Department of Juvenile Justice. Members of the research team examined the reports for specific or general recommendations in the psychologist’s report, recommendations and sentencing dispositions made by the magistrate, and welfare requirements outlined by the magistrate with the disposition. Results showed that while magistrates on the whole reported strong support for psychological reports as an aid to sentencing, the use of such reports appeared to be less in terms of suggesting recommendations but much more in fine tuning the understanding of the young offender. Magistrates were more likely to take up recommendations relating to custodial or noncustodial dispositions than welfare needs. Results showed that magistrates did not endorse specific treatment recommendations but, when interviewed, they made it quite clear they valued such recommendations. 2 tables, 6 references, 2 footnotes
Main Term(s): Australia; Foreign juvenile justice systems; Sentencing recommendations
Index Term(s): Court referrals; Criminality prediction; Emotional disorders; Forensic psychology; Juvenile psychological evaluation; Offender mental health services; Presentence studies; Psychologists role in corrections
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=191095

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.