U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Fundamental Rules of Evidence

NCJ Number
192054
Journal
Chief of Police Volume: 16 Issue: 5 Dated: September-October 2001 Pages: 53-55
Author(s)
Jim Kouri
Date Published
September 2001
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This article summarizes methods used in ancient times to provide the truth of accusations brought against a person and explains the current basic rules of evidence.
Abstract
Early societies often sought the truth through cruel and brutal physical ordeals on the belief that God would protect the innocent and punish the guilty. Methods included ordeals by combat, fire and water, and trial by compurgation. These primitive methods did not involve any element of persuasion or concern with the reliability of the tests involved or with witness credibility. The development of the jury system in the common law introduced the element of persuasion through the presentation of evidence to substantiate claims and allegations. Legal jurisprudence and judicial decisions established rules regarding the presentation of evidence for the determination of guilt or innocence. Evidence includes direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, and real evidence. Crucial issues include admissibility and relevancy. Spontaneous declarations preceding, accompanying, or immediately following a criminal act are admitted in evidence as an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. The courts are always in a state of flux regarding evidence; United States Supreme Court decisions frequently redefine the admissibility of evidence.

Downloads

No download available

Availability