skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 194709 Find in a Library
Title: Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: Comparing Public Preferences and Judicial Practice
Journal: Criminal Justice Policy Review  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:March 2002  Pages:46-64
Author(s): Jennifer Tufts; Julian V. Roberts
Date Published: March 2002
Page Count: 19
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on a representative Canadian national survey of the general public that permitted comparisons of the public's sentencing preferences with the actual sentencing practices of youth courts.
Abstract: The study also explored the effect of three legally relevant factors (offender age, offense characteristics, and offender criminal history) on public sentencing preferences; further, it explored the relationship between important respondent variables (such as victimization history) and attitudes toward the use of incarceration for young offenders. Data were obtained from Statistics Canada's 1999 General Social Survey, which is an annual survey that monitors changes in Canadian society and provides information on specific policy issues of current or emerging interest. A total of 25,876 people were interviewed for the 1999 survey. Respondents were asked to sentence offenders described in vignettes. The offense of conviction was either burglary or assault. The findings showed an agreement between the general public and the practice of the courts regarding the use of incarceration for young offenders. For the first-offender burglary scenario, the incarceration rate from the public was only 4 percent higher than the actual imprisonment rate for youth courts; similarly, for the recidivist burglar, the incarceration rate for the public was not significantly different from that of the youth courts (55 percent compared with 50 percent). Only for the case of assault by a recidivist offender was the public significantly harsher, with a rate of 54 percent compared to 32 percent for the courts. Overall, the public incarceration rate in the four scenarios was 37 percent, compared with 28 percent for the youth court. Consistent with the findings of previous research, respondents who had been criminally victimized were no more punitive than respondents who did not report having been victimized. 2 tables, 2 figures, and 30 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile sentencing
Index Term(s): Assault and battery; Burglary; Canada; Comparative analysis; Foreign criminal justice research; Juvenile burglary; Public Opinion of Corrections; Public Opinion of Crime; Public Opinion of the Courts; Sentencing factors; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.