U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reducing Juvenile Crime: Conferencing Versus Court

NCJ Number
194918
Author(s)
Garth Luke; Bronwyn Lind
Date Published
April 2002
Length
20 pages
Annotation
This New South Wales (Australia) study compared reoffending by juveniles who participated in a conference with reoffending by juveniles who attended court.
Abstract
With the commencement of New South Wales' Young Offenders Act, Youth Justice Conferencing was introduced across New South Wales as an alternative to a court appearance for juveniles. At a conference, the juvenile offender, his/her family, victims, and other supporters discuss the offending and its impact in order to encourage acceptance of responsibility by the offender, provide some form of restitution, and help to reintegrate the offender back into his/her family and community. This study focused on the reoffending patterns of juveniles who participated in conferences during the first year of operation of the Young Offenders Act, from April 6, 1998, to April 5, 1999. The findings were compared with the reoffending of juveniles who went to court during the same period. To aid comparison of the two groups and reduce the effect of prior sanctions, the study focused on first offenders. The study involved 590 first offenders who attended a conference and 3,830 first offenders who had a proven outcome at court. Since data on offending were available up to June 30, 2001, the follow-up period ranged from 27 to 39 months, depending on the date of first appearance. For the purposes of this study, "reoffending" was defined as "an appearance at court which results in the offense being proven, or an appearance at a conference for a new offending episode." The study found that conferencing yielded a moderate reduction of 15 percent to 20 percent in reoffending compared with the juveniles who went to court. This reduction held across different offense types and regardless of the gender, criminal history, age, and Aboriginality of the offenders. Although the reduction in reoffending may be small, the effect was persistent in all of the comparisons conducted. 22 tables, 7 figures, 8 notes, 16 references, and appended overview of research on restorative justice reoffending, data used in the study, and the definition of offense types used in the study