skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 195547 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Gender, Self-Control, and Informal Social Control in Adolescence: A Test of Three Models of the Continuity of Delinquent Behavior
Journal: Youth & Society  Volume:33  Issue:4  Dated:June 2002  Pages:479-514
Author(s): W. Alex Mason; Michael Windle
Date Published: June 2002
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Health and Human Services
Rockville, MD 20892-9304
Grant Number: R37-AA07861
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study tested three theories of delinquent behavior to see if childhood behavior problems were related to adolescent delinquency.
Abstract: Childhood conduct problems place boys and girls at increased risk for involvement in juvenile delinquency, which increases risk for involvement in adult crime. According to the general theory of crime, the primary cause of delinquent behavior is low self-control, emerging early in life as a result of ineffective socialization. The social control theory states that social controls, especially those that are informal, inhibit norm-violating behavior. There are four elements of social bonding: attachment; commitment; involvement in conventional activities, such as school and work; and holding beliefs that endorse conventional values and norms. The age-graded theory of informal social control assumes that crime and other forms of deviance result in part from weak or broken bonds to society. The difference between this theory and social control theory is that the former acknowledges the role of both state dependence (social control processes) and population heterogeneity (self-control) in the continuity of delinquent behavior. The three theories were evaluated with a series of nested structural equation models in a sample of 840 middle adolescents. The results showed that, for boys, there was clear support for the mixed, partial mediation models of the associations between self-control and major and minor delinquency. Childhood behavior problems had both direct and indirect effects on adolescent crime and risky behavior. The results for girls stood in contrast to those for boys. The direct model implied by the general theory was supported regarding girls’ involvement in major delinquency. Analyses revealed that the effect of self-control on major delinquency was direct and unmediated. 4 figures, 3 tables, appendix, 4 notes, 77 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency factors; Juvenile Delinquency prevention theory
Index Term(s): Environmental influences; Integrated theories of crime; Juvenile delinquency research; Juvenile delinquency theory; Male female juvenile offender comparisons; Psychological causes of delinquency
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.