skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 197047 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Utah's Early Intervention Mandate: The Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines and Intermediate Sanctions
Author(s): Russell K. Van Vleet M.S.W; Matthew J. Davis B.S.; John DeWitt Ph.D.; Edward C. Brynes Ph.D.; Amanda Barusch Ph.D.
Date Published: March 2002
Page Count: 109
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 98-JB-VX-0111
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document provides an evaluation of the effectiveness Utah’s Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines and Intermediate Sanctions in reducing recidivism among young offenders.
Abstract: Utah’s Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines were designed as an early intervention tactic to provide intensive supervision and service development between regular probation and community placement. This document provides an evaluation of the effectiveness of this program in curbing recidivism among youthful offenders. Results show that, in general, Utah successfully implemented the program. Sixty new full-time probation officers were hired and caseloads were reduced from an average of 29 in 1996 to 20 in 1999. Furthermore, the frequency of contact between the juvenile offender and the probation officer has substantially increased. The rate of recidivism has similarly been affected: those offenders on probation in 1999 had fewer offenses during a two-year follow-up period and a longer period of elapsed time before being charged with a subsequent crime. The researchers state the effect of Utah’s new program for juvenile offenders is modest in its ability to deter recidivism. While those offenders who participated in the new program had fewer offenses in the year following probation, their levels of re-arrest in the future matched the population in general. The researchers found that age start of probation, number of prior arrests, and sex were more predictive of recidivism than was participation in Utah’s new Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines. The authors offer several recommendations to increase the success of the model program, including providing training for prosecutors and defense attorneys. Tables, references, appendices
Main Term(s): Juvenile correctional programs; Juvenile Recidivism
Index Term(s): Juvenile case disposition; Juvenile case management; Juvenile delinquency prevention; Juvenile justice management; Juvenile justice policies; Juvenile parole officers; Juvenile probation; Juvenile probation effectiveness; Juvenile processing; Juvenile program evaluation; Juvenile treatment evaluation
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.