skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 198103 Find in a Library
Title: On Gang Girls, Gender and a Structured Action Theory: A Reply to Miller
Journal: Theoretical Criminology  Volume:6  Issue:4  Dated:November 2002  Pages:461-475
Author(s): James W. Messerschmidt
Date Published: November 2002
Page Count: 15
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article discusses the contention that structured action theory is tautological (needlessly repetitive) because it converts into gender difference.
Abstract: Citing selected evidence from a study of gang girls, “One of the Guys” (2001), and using the concept of gender crossing, it was previously suggested that structured action theory is capable only of conceptualizing differences within femininities and crime and is unable to recognize the commonalities across gender. Much research on gender and crime has neglected the combined importance of social situations, the fluidity of gender, and structured relations of gender, race, and class. When different contexts are examined, situations can be conceptualized where gender difference is highly prominent when compared to those situations in which gender difference is relatively diminished. The case of gang girls exhibits a unique fluidity of gender in which different gender practices are emphasized or avoided depending on the social setting. Occasionally, gang girls engage in behavior, such as physical violence, that is similar to behavior usually associated with gang boys. More detail and analyses are required on why gang girls engage in crime, how gang girls “do” crime differently, what the different meanings of crime are to gang girls, under what circumstances gang girls engage in crime, and how their crimes relate to masculinities and femininities. Structured action theory does not convert gender difference, but rather acknowledges that both gang boys and girls are capable of “doing” masculinities and femininities. What is essential for understanding these various forms of gender construction and their relation to crime is conceptualizing how social action is structured by specific gender relations (and race and class) within particular gangs. 11 notes, 24 references
Main Term(s): Criminology theory evaluation; Gender issues
Index Term(s): Crime causes theory; Evaluation criteria; Female crime patterns; Feminist jurisprudence; Genetic influences on behavior; Male female offender comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.