skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 198428 Find in a Library
Title: Disproportionate Minority Confinement: A Review of the Research Literature From 1989 Through 2001
Author(s): Carl E. Pope; Rick Lovell; Heidi M. Hsia
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Contract Number: 97-JN-FX-K002
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Literature Review
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This bulletin reviews studies of disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of juveniles that have been published in professional academic journals and scholarly books from March 1989 through December 2001.
Abstract: Similar to an earlier research summary (Pope and Feyerherm, 1990), the current review focuses on empirical research studies of the official processing of minority youth, defined by the U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention as African-Americans, American Indians, Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics. The studies reviewed examined an array of processing points and outcomes, including arrest, detention, petition, adjudication, and disposition. Disposition (20 studies) and petition (13 studies) were the most frequently examined processing points; more than half (18) of the studies examined multiple decision points in juvenile justice processing. The majority of the studies reviewed (25 out of 34) reported race effects in the processing of youth. Taken together, the research findings support the existence of disparities and potential biases in juvenile justice processing; however, the causes and mechanisms of these disparities are complex. Important contributing factors may include inherent system bias, effects of local policies and practices, and social conditions (inequality, family situation, or underemployment) that may place youth at risk. Overrepresentation may also result from the interaction of a number of factors. This review shows that the body of knowledge concerning DMC is growing, albeit slowly, and the research is increasing in complexity. It highlights the diversity present across the studies in terms of perspectives, approaches, designs, definitions, and measures. This bulletin concludes with guidelines for further research in this area and recommendations for a national policy agenda regarding DMC research. 34-item bibliography
Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
Index Term(s): Juvenile case disposition; Minority overrepresentation; OJJDP grant-related documents; Racial discrimination; Sentencing disparity
Note: Downloaded January 2, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.