skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 200223 Find in a Library
Title: Multisystemic Therapy: Community-Based Treatment for High Risk Young Offenders: Rationale and Overview From the Randomized Clinical Trials in Canada (From UNAFEI Annual Report for 2000 and Resource Material Series No. 59, P 54-82, 2002, -- See NCJ-200221)
Author(s): Alan W. Leschied Ph.D.
Date Published: October 2002
Page Count: 29
Sponsoring Agency: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders
Tokyo, Japan
Sale Source: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders
26-1 Harumi-Cho, Fuchu
Tokyo,
Japan
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: Japan
Annotation: This document discusses community-based treatment for high-risk young offenders and an overview of clinical trials in Canada.
Abstract: In the 1960's to the 1980's, three major influences fueled the debate that culminated in the 1984 proclamation of the Youth Offenders Act (YOA). These influences were the growing recognition that young people needed to be afforded protection under law; increasing skepticism about the effects of social re-engineering to reduce conditions thought to affect misbehavior among young people; and recognition that the offense of delinquency was too broad. Public attitudes were that the youth justice system was soft on crime and more emphasis was needed on making the punishment fit the crime. There was a lack of custody alternatives. The sentencing options were custody, community supervision, or measures with no correctional intervention. The rates of custody in 9 of 10 provinces approximate 34 percent of youth court dispositions. Seventy-five percent of Federal to provincial youth offender cost sharing funds custody facilities. Recent amendments to the YOA have focused on increasing severity of sanctions for youth with serious offenses while encouraging the use of community-based alternatives. The Multisystemic Therapy Approach (MST) adopts a social-ecological approach to understanding anti-social behavior. The underlying premise is that criminal conduct is multi-causal; therefore, effective interventions should address the multiple sources of criminogenic influence. The needs of youth are understood by assessing the “fit” between them and their immediate social context. MST has shown through randomized trials to be an effective means of delivering service to high-risk youth. Ontario’s randomized clinical trial included four geographic sites involving nine separate agencies. MST Inc. trained and licensed each of the four sites during the course of implementation. Evaluation included variables reflecting both process and outcome evaluation. Cost effectiveness and service utilization rates were factored separately to evaluate outcomes from intervention. The MST implementation project provided a revised look at the mission to provide effective services to youths at risk while stemming the trend toward continuing reliance on custody. Bibliography
Main Term(s): Foreign juvenile justice systems; Juvenile treatment methods
Index Term(s): Canada; Intermediate treatment; Juvenile psychological evaluation; Probation or parole services; Services effectiveness; Treatment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200223

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.