skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 200683 Find in a Library
Title: Court Procedures for Handling Intoxicated Drivers
Journal: Alcohol Research & Health  Volume:25  Issue:1  Dated:2001  Pages:32-42
Author(s): Robert B. Voas Ph.D.; Deborah A. Fisher Ph.D.
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 11
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents an overview of the court procedures currently used in the United States to handle offenders who drive while intoxicated (DWI).
Abstract: After reviewing some general considerations and historical developments in the identification and sanctioning of DWI offenders, the authors discuss various types of sanctions used, followed by descriptions of the judicial process for adjudicating DWI offenses and the various stages in the process where interventions can occur. The authors note that more than one-third of first-time DWI offenders are rearrested, which has led legislators and policymakers to focus on hard-core drinking drivers who are so often impaired when driving that they have a record of multiple convictions. This is especially disconcerting because of the generally low apprehension rates for DWI drivers. Court sanctions for DWI offenders can be divided into four categories based on differing concepts of why people drink and drive and how recidivism can be prevented. They involve penalties to achieve deterrence, education programs, alcoholism treatment programs, and incapacitating sanctions. Sanctions for deterrence typically involve fines and/or incarceration. Education programs provide information on key alcohol-related issues, such as alcohol's effects on driving performance, the relationship between rate of consumption and blood-alcohol concentration, and the nature of DWI laws. Therapeutic programs aim to reduce impaired driving by promoting recovery from alcohol abuse and dependence. Incapacitation can involve the impoundment of the offender's vehicle, ignition interlocks, license plate impoundment, and house arrest and electronic home monitoring. Based on research conducted to date, the two most effective means of reducing recidivism among DWI offenders are rehabilitative programs and incapacitation; the usefulness of punishment is limited. In describing the court procedures that are used for imposing DWI sanctions, this article focuses on juvenile courts, civil proceedings, pretrial hearings, pretrial programs, presentencing programs, probation, and extended supervision by judges. 53 references
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Alcohol abuse education; Alcoholism treatment programs; Deterrence effectiveness; Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Drunk driver programs; Fines; Incarceration; Selective incapacitation; Sentencing/Sanctions; Traffic law enforcement; Traffic offenses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200683

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.