skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202549 Find in a Library
Title: Communication Between Courts and Expert Witnesses in Legal Proceedings Concerning Child Sexual Abuse in Sweden: A Case Review
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect  Volume:25  Issue:11  Dated:November 2001  Pages:1497-1516
Author(s): Clara H. Gumpert; Frank Lindblad
Date Published: November 2001
Page Count: 20
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This examination of the communication between courts and expert witnesses in Swedish legal proceedings that involved child sexual abuse focused on the referral questions from court to expert, how the consulted experts had performed their evaluations, how the court had accounted for the expert's opinion in its own documentation, and the identification of communication patterns.
Abstract: This study was part of a larger study of court files for child sexual abuse cases, which reviewed all 800 cases tried in Swedish district courts during the years 1985, 1989, 1992, and 1997. All of the cases examined had been brought to trial. There were 143 cases in which an expert witness had been consulted on the following issues: to give an opinion on credibility or reliability related to the child or a child's statement; to offer comments on matters of credibility or reliability in the written expert report; or to discuss the expert's statement in relation to such issues. Because a qualitative methodology was used, a small sample size was selected (n=20). A cross-professional research team performed a qualitative text analysis of the files of the 20 court cases, which occurred over the span of the 4 years examined. The study found that expert witnesses used a wide variety of assessment procedures for determining a child's credibility and reliability in the sexual abuse cases. Several patterns of communication difficulties between the court and the expert witnesses were identified. They were labeled as "mismatch," "misunderstanding," "misuse," and "missing pieces." The experts and the courts sometimes used the same or similar words (e.g., "credibility"), but apparently applied different meanings to them, indicating the lack of a common conceptual framework for the court and the expert. The study concluded that the combination of brief assignments for expert witnesses and experts' use of diverse assessment procedures constituted a specific risk factor for impaired communication between the court and the expert. This paper concludes with a discussion of various strategies for improving court-expert communication. 2 tables and 54 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Child Sexual Abuse; Communication techniques; Communications; Expert witnesses; Juvenile witnesses; Psychiatric testimony; Sweden; Witness credibility
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202549

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.