skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 203599 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Maryland: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings
Corporate Author: American Bar Assoc
Juvenile Justice Ctr
United States of America
Editor(s): Elizabeth Cumming; Michael Finley; Shannon Hall; Alecia Humphrey; Ilona Prieto Picou; Patricia Puritz
Date Published: October 2003
Page Count: 87
Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Assoc
Washington, DC 20005
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Baltimore, MD 21202
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Open Society Foundation
New York, NY 10019
Grant Number: 1999-JN-FX-0003
Sale Source: American Bar Assoc
Juvenile Justice Ctr
740 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report offers an assessment of access to counsel and quality of representation in delinquency proceedings for children in the State of Maryland.
Abstract: This report, which focuses specifically on the state of access to counsel for children in Maryland, is part of a nationwide effort to address deficiencies in juvenile indigent defense practices. Data for this assessment were collected through extensive interviews with judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, intake officers, probation officers, court clerks, detention center staff, police officers, children and families, and policymakers in the State of Maryland. Additionally, observations were conducted of juvenile court proceedings in selected counties, site visits were made to every juvenile detention center in Maryland, and extensive legal and literature reviews were undertaken. Results indicate that the juvenile defense system in Maryland is centralized and statewide, but various systemic barriers and obstacles were noted in the overall system delivery. Significant findings indicate that despite the centralized nature of the juvenile justice system, there is no consistent internal oversight of indigent juvenile defense practices. Inconsistent policies and practices within public defender offices creates significant gaps in juvenile defense representation which results in the absence of counsel at various stages of the justice process, unequal access to counsel for Maryland’s poor children, and inadequate preparation for juvenile cases at all points in the justice process. The report notes that, in addition to unequal access to counsel for poor children, the majority of youth in detention are incarcerated without adequate and effective representation; many defenders are poorly prepared in transfer and waiver cases; many defenders are ill prepared for adjudication and disposition hearings; and a lack of financial support results in an under-evaluation of juvenile defense services. Furthermore, the evaluation finds support for the argument that the Maryland juvenile justice system serves as a “dumping ground” for children who have been failed by the mental health systems and the school systems. Other findings indicate that in every county visited, minorities are overrepresented in Maryland’s juvenile justice system and that girls are offered few services that deal specifically with the main causes of female delinquency. Despite these problems, the report summarizes some of the promising approaches found within Maryland’s juvenile justice system and offers 10 recommendations for the improvement of the juvenile justice system in this State. Endnotes
Main Term(s): Maryland; State juvenile justice systems
Index Term(s): Access to legal information; Defense counsel effectiveness; Juvenile case management; Juvenile due process; Juvenile justice policies; Right to counsel
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=203599

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.