skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 205561 Find in a Library
Title: Confirmed, Unconfirmed, and False Allegations of Abuse Made by Adults with Mental Retardation Who are Members of a Class Action Lawsuit
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect  Volume:25  Issue:8  Dated:August 2001  Pages:1121-1132
Author(s): Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell; James R. Dudley
Date Published: August 2001
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: North Carolina Dept of Health and Human Services
Raleigh, NC 27699
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined differences in confirmed, unconfirmed, and false allegations of abuse made by "consumers" with mental retardation who were part of a class-action lawsuit in North Carolina ("Thomas S.") that claimed abuse in a State psychiatric hospital.
Abstract: In 1984 the court found that their care in the State psychiatric hospitals violated their constitutional rights of safety, protection from harm, treatment under safe conditions, freedom from undue restraint, and minimally adequate rehabilitation or treatment. Interviews were conducted with 1,220 people with mental retardation who were part of the lawsuit. A content analysis of their abuse allegations was conducted. Frequencies of responses and subgroup differences were determined for each type of abuse allegation and each perpetrator. Three questions were addressed for each abuse claim: who reported allegations of abuse?; what type of abuse was reported; and who were the alleged perpetrators. Overall, 9.1 percent of the "Thomas S." consumers made an allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation. There were 85 unconfirmed claims (53.8 percent), 40 false allegations (25.3 percent), and 33 confirmed claims (20.9 percent). Females made more allegations of abuse than males in general, as well as more allegations of rape. There were no significant differences among the subgroups by type of abuse allegation. There were significant differences among the subgroups regarding the alleged perpetrator. Other consumers with mental retardation were most often accused of confirmed assaults, and staff members were most often stated to be the perpetrators in false allegations. This study supports previous study findings that consumers with mild mental retardation tend to report abuse more often than consumers with severe/profound mental retardation. The ability of the consumer to report vital information may be a significant factor in explaining this difference in reports of abuse. Whether or not this ability to report explains this difference is a subject for future research. Although there were reports of familial abuse in this study, family members were not the most common perpetrators, a departure from the findings of previous studies. Other consumers within the same living arrangement were the most frequent confirmed perpetrators. In addition to providing greater protection for mentally retarded residents of care facilities, there should also be safeguards in place that can quickly expose and dispel false allegations of abuse against staff. 4 tables and 24 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Class action lawsuits; Institutional elder abuse; Mental defectives; Mental disorders; Persons with cognitive disabilities
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.