skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 207123 Find in a Library
Title: Factors Influencing Release and Bail Decisions in New York City, Part 3. Cross-Borough Analysis
Author(s): Mary T. Phillips Ph.D.
Corporate Author: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: July 2004
Page Count: 81
Sponsoring Agency: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
New York, NY 10007
Sale Source: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
52 Duane Street, 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10007
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This third part of a three-part report on a study of judicial release and bail decisions at criminal court arraignment in New York City presents borough comparisons (Manhattan and Brooklyn) and synthesizes the findings for samples of cases processed between September 2002 through March 2003.
Abstract: A total of 15 judges in Brooklyn and 17 judges in Manhattan were included in the research, with the number of cases for each judge varying from 1 to 195 in Brooklyn and from 13 to 147 in Manhattan, yielding 1,000 observed cases in Manhattan and 999 in Brooklyn. The outcomes of primary interest were the judge's release-on-recognizance (ROR) decision and the amount of bail set. For both boroughs, the prosecutor's bail request was the most powerful predictor of both ROR and bail amount, with it being the only important factor in fixing bail amount. Defendant's warrant history and charge severity were important determinants of the prosecutor's consent to ROR. The defense attorney's influence on a judge's ROR and bail decisions was negligible. The report's possible explanations for the major finding of the study is judges' reliance on prosecutors to assimilate the essentials of each case, judges' and prosecutors' agreement on the important factors in the case, and prosecutors' adjustment of bail requests to reflect the decision patterns of particular judges. There was inequity in both prosecutorial ROR recommendations and judicial ROR decisions for similar defendants. 9 figures, 9 tables, and appended independent variable and logistic regression models of ROR
Main Term(s): Municipal courts
Index Term(s): Arraignment; Bail hearing; Bail/Financial Release; Discretionary decisions; Judicial discretion; New York; Pretrial release; Prosecutors; Release on recognizance
Note: For other reports in this series, see NCJ-207121-22.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.