skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 209504 Find in a Library
Title: Professionals' Attitudes and Accuracy on Child Abuse Reporting Decisions in New Zealand
Journal: Journal of Interpersonal Violence  Volume:17  Issue:3  Dated:March 2002  Pages:320-342
Author(s): Christina M. Rodriguez
Date Published: March 2002
Page Count: 23
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study in New Zealand, which has no mandatory child abuse reporting laws, examined professionals' decisions to report suspicions of child abuse to child protective services.
Abstract: The study involved 255 professionals in the fields of health, education, and mental health. This sample was derived from returned questionnaires sent to professionals in these three fields. Based on the responses received, the overall sample was predominantly female, ranging in age from 22 to 74, with considerable professional experience. In addition to obtaining demographic and other background information, participants were presented with 12 potential child abuse scenarios that were constructed from modifications of actual reported cases. These scenarios were presented in random order and involved sexual and physical abuse as well as neglect. Half of the scenarios were considered by child protective services to be reportable, and the other half had insufficient cause for investigation. Certainty ratings on reporting decisions and eight attitudes toward reporting were also obtained. Compared to the judgment of child protective services on the scenarios, the mental health professionals were less accurate in their reporting decisions than were teachers or doctors. Across occupations, those opposed to mandatory reporting were least accurate but most certain in their reporting decisions. Accuracy was lowest for child neglect and highest for sexual abuse cases. There was no relationship between age or experience and the accuracy, attitudes, or certainty of the respondents. Researchers should focus on whether more comprehensive training could improve accuracy and reporting behavior. 4 tables and 47 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Child abuse; Child abuse detection; Child abuse reporting; Educators; Foreign criminal justice research; Mental health services; New Zealand; Physician child abuse neglect role
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=209504

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.