U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives

NCJ Number
209713
Journal
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Volume: 21 Issue: 2 Dated: May 2005 Pages: 120-134
Author(s)
Mark S. Fleisher
Date Published
May 2005
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This article examines participant observation and social network analysis as primary gang-research methodologies and shows how these two are not mutually exclusive, field-based research techniques.
Abstract
The concepts of gangs as groups and of gang boundaries are compared using observation-narrative data and egocentric network data. Focusing on these groups and boundaries assists in illustrating, through argument, that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs and are therefore, not mutually exclusive, field-based research techniques. Participant observation is seen as an effective technique to gather systematic observations on people and places and systematic and impromptu interviews with gang youth, neighborhood residents, local police, business owners, and other stakeholders influenced by the youth gangs. A social network is a set of actors and a relation measured across those actors. Social network analysis assumes that network actors’ interactions create persistent social patterns of interaction that influence individual behavior. Compositional analyses of personal (egocentric) social networks of same-gang youth provide measures of peer influence processes beyond participant observation. Comparative analyses of opposite-gang adolescents’ egocentric networks indicate a wide overlap among inter-gang friends. References