skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 210009 Find in a Library
Title: Juvenile Court-Controlled Reentry: Three Practice Models
Author(s): Patrick Griffin
Corporate Author: National Ctr for Juvenile Justice
Research Division
United States of America
Date Published: February 2005
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Ctr for Juvenile Justice
Pittsburgh, PA 15203-2363
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2002-JN-FX-0001(S-1)
Sale Source: National Ctr for Juvenile Justice
Research Division
3700 South Water Street, Suite 200
Pittsburgh, PA 15203-2363
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This bulletin examines three jurisdictions in which practice models have been introduced to enable local juvenile courts and their probation departments to directly oversee the reentry of juveniles after release from residential placements.
Abstract: The three sites are in Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), PA; Marion County (Indianapolis), IN; and rural West Virginia counties that are participating in the State's Division of Juvenile Services Reentry Court Program. Although the three programs differ in many respects, they all use local court authority, knowledge, and sanctioning flexibility to monitor and support juveniles after their return from residential placements. The Allegheny County model, which began in 1997, requires that all juveniles returning to the county from residential placement receive a minimum of 90 days of aftercare supervision. This is achieved through day-reporting programs. The West Virginia model covers 10 largely rural counties in the northeastern panhandle. The State's Division of Juvenile Services provides enhanced supervision and case management to returning "high-risk" juvenile in participating counties, and local courts provide oversight in the form of monthly court hearings to review progress and enforce conditions. The Marion County model is similar to the West Virginia model in using a State-local partnership. A juvenile reentry court conducts frequent oversight and enforcement hearings under State-local reentry planning and supervision. The program involves only one of three high-crime Indianapolis neighborhoods. Lessons drawn from the models encompass a strategy for selecting a target population, planning and preparation, postrelease monitoring, services and supports, an incentive structure, and integration after reentry. 20 notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile reintegration
Index Term(s): Indiana; Juvenile Aftercare; Juvenile courts; Juvenile probation; Pennsylvania; West Virginia
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. Technical Assistance to the Juvenile Court, Special Project Bulletin; downloaded May 31, 2005.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.