skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 210284 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Assessing the Impact of Statutory Change: A Statewide Multilevel Analysis of Restitution Orders in Pennsylvania
Journal: Crime & Delinquency  Volume:51  Issue:3  Dated:July 2005  Pages:318-342
Author(s): R. Barry Ruback; Gretchen R. Ruth; Jennifer N. Shaffer
Date Published: 2005
Page Count: 25
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Pennsylvania Cmssn on Crime and Delinquency
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Grant Number: 97-CE-VX-0001
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study analyzed Pennsylvania court decisions in 170,260 restitution-eligible cases from 1990 to 1998, so as to identify the policies underlying the imposition of restitution as a discretionary decision, as well as to assess whether a 1995 statutory change that made restitution mandatory changed those policies.
Abstract: The data consisted primarily of sentencing information from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing for the years 1990 to 1994 and 1996 to 1998. These individual and case-level data were supplemented with contextual information from the 1990 U.S. Census, the 1990 Uniform Crime Reports, and reports issued by the Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee (2000). In addition to restitution outcome, the analysis included four legally relevant case variables: offense type, offense severity, prior record, mode of conviction, and controls for fines and incarceration. Offender demographics were also considered. Six variables represented the social, political, and criminal justice context of each county. Multilevel analyses of restitution decisions suggested that judges considered restitution to be both a victim-focused sanction, in that restitution was ordered more for offenders who committed more serious crimes and for property offenders, and an offender-focused sanction, in that restitution was ordered more for offenders who pled guilty, offenders with no prior record, White offenders, and female offenders. The statutory change increased the proportion of restitution orders statewide from 1996 to 1998. This apparently met the policy goal of a greater focus on victim needs. 4 tables, 24 notes, and 36 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Judicial discretion; NIJ grant-related documents; Pennsylvania; Restitution; Sentencing factors; Sentencing trends; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.