skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 211170 Find in a Library
Title: Attorney-Client Relationship in Capital Cases and Its Impact on Juror Receptivity to Mitigation Evidence
Journal: Justice Quarterly  Volume:22  Issue:3  Dated:September 2005  Pages:340-363
Author(s): Thomas W. Brewer
Date Published: September 2005
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
Grant Number: NSF SES-9013252
Publisher: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/ 
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the relationship between a capital juror’s perception of the attorney-client relationship and how that perception affects their ability or willingness to consider mitigation evidence presented during the penalty phase of a capital trial.
Abstract: The United States Supreme Court has placed a great deal of trust in the ability and willingness of capital jurors to consider mitigation evidence during sentencing deliberations as a constitutional aspect of capital sentencing. This study tested the proposition that the manner in which the defense attorney and defendant interact in the presence of the jury will have some effect on the decisionmaking process of individual jurors. The assumption is that the more jurors perceive a close and warm relationship between the attorney and client, the more willing and able they will be to consider evidence (mitigating) which tends to make a death sentence seem less appropriate. Data for the study were compiled by the Capital Jury Project (CJP). The complete CJP dataset contains information on 1,198 jurors. For this study, the sample consisted of 725 which included only those respondents who were asked survey items used in the construction of this model. The respondent’s perception of the defendant as having human characteristics was shown to have a significant relationship to receptivity. The more human qualities the defendant appears to possess in the eyes of the juror, the more receptive that juror is to mitigation. The results support the conclusion that a juror’s perception of the attorney-client relationship is related to their receptivity to mitigating factors. These findings represent an important advance in the understanding of how jurors view the interaction between defense attorneys and capital defendants, and how this view influences the decisionmaking process. References
Main Term(s): Attorney client relations
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Jury decisionmaking; Reasonable doubt
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=232432

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.