skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 211807 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of the High Range PCA Guideline Judgment on Sentencing Drink Drivers in NSW
Author(s): Patrizia Poletti
Date Published: September 2005
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Judicial Cmssn of New South Wales
Sydney NSW, 2000
Sale Source: Judicial Cmssn of New South Wales
Level 5
301 George Street
Sydney NSW,
Australia
Publisher: http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/ 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This study assessed the impact of a New South Wales' (Australia) revised sentencing guideline on sentencing patterns for drunk driving that involves a high range prescribed concentration of alcohol (PCA).
Abstract: The revised sentencing guideline stemmed from the New South Wales (NSW) Attorney General's application to the Court of Criminal Appeal for a guideline judgment with reference to a high range PCA drunk-driving offense. A particular concern was that too many of these offenders were receiving s 10 orders, i.e., orders that resulted in either an outright dismissal or a conditional discharge that avoids the usual consequences of a recorded conviction and sentence. On September 8, 2004, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal delivered a guideline judgment for the offense. The study reported in this paper examined sentencing patterns for high range PCA offenses before and after the guideline was delivered. Further, it examined the results of sentence appeals to the District Court, so as to determine whether there has been any change in the nature and outcomes of such appeals since the promulgation of the guideline. This involved an analysis of trends in the penalties imposed for high range PCA offenses over a 2-year period (2003-2004). Although the use of s 10 orders for high range PCA offenses was decreasing over the 12 months prior to the new sentencing guideline, it decreased further in the postguideline period, from 5.6 percent just prior to the guideline to 2.2 percent in the postguideline period. There was a corresponding increase in the percentage of such offenders who had their drivers licenses suspended. There was also a more exaggerated distinction in the severity of sentences between first offenders and repeat offenders, particularly when repeat offenses continued to involve high range PCA. The revised guideline is apparently being implemented by the courts. 12 figures and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Foreign sentencing; New South Wales; Sentencing guideline compliance; Sentencing guidelines
Note: From Sentencing Trends & Issues, Number 35, September 2005.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=233269

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.