skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 212734 Find in a Library
Title: Can Information Change Public Opinion?: Another Test of the Marshall Hypotheses
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:33  Issue:6  Dated:November/December 2005  Pages:573-584
Author(s): John K. Cochran; Mitchell B. Chamlin
Date Published: November 2005
Page Count: 12
Publisher: http://www.elsevier.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using a one-group pretest-posttest design modeled after the works of Bohm and his colleagues, this study tested hypotheses derived from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's arguments regarding the utility of public opinion polls as a tool for assessing the "evolving standards of decency" regarding capital punishment.
Abstract: Marshall's arguments, known as the Marshall hypotheses, are as follows: support for capital punishment is inversely associated with knowledge about it; exposure to information about capital punishment produces sentiments in opposition to capital punishment; and exposure to information about capital punishment will have no impact on those who support it for retributive reasons. The subjects for this study were 70 undergraduate students of a large, urban university in west-central Florida. They were enrolled in a special topics course on the death penalty within a criminology major during the summer of 2003. The course met for 3.5 hours a day twice a week for 6 weeks. The assigned text for the course was Bohm's "Deathquest II" (2003b). In addition to the text, other sources of death penalty information were also supplied to students. Students' attitudes toward capital punishment were assessed before and after the course. The study measured knowledge gain and its association with attitudinal change regarding the death penalty. The study found some evidence that death-penalty attitudes and beliefs were inversely linked with a student's level of knowledge about how the death penalty is used and its impact. Death-penalty supporters were somewhat less informed than death-penalty opponents. Exposure to death penalty information and knowledge gains tended to be associated with attitudinal change in directions suggested by Marshall' hypotheses; however, retributivists' attitudes toward and beliefs about capital punishment were not any more resistant to change than were the attitudes or beliefs of non-retributivists, thus failing to support Marshall's third hypothesis. 6 tables and 26 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Attitude change; Capital punishment; Public information; Public Opinion of Corrections
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=234217

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.