skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 213319 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of Pre-Recorded Video and Closed Circuit Television Testimony by Adult Sexual Assault Complainants on Jury Decision-Making: An Experimental Study
Author(s): Natalie Taylor; Jacqueline Joudo
Date Published: 2005
Page Count: 121
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Institute of Criminology
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
New South Wales Attorney General's Dept
Barton Act 2600, Australia
Publication Number: ISBN 0-642-53892-1
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601,
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: Using mock trials, this Australian study examined whether a particular mode of victim testimony--face-to-face, closed circuit television, or video--and two styles of victim presentation (neutral or emotional) had an impact on jury decisionmaking in adult sexual assault cases.
Abstract: The main finding was that the mode of testimony did not have a significant impact on jury decisionmaking; neither was there any consistent impact on jurors' perceptions or decisions based on the victim's presentation style. The study did find, however, that jurors' personal beliefs, the requirement to convict beyond reasonable doubt, and the difficulty of understanding the meaning of "consent" did influence jurors' decisions. None of the jury panels returned a guilty verdict. The authors advise that understanding the beliefs and expectations of jurors regarding what constitutes sexual assault is apparently the key to juror decisionmaking about the credibility of the complainant's testimony and the defendant's guilt. This randomized experiment involved 210 people who participated as jurors in 18 mock trials. Jurors were randomly assigned to groups, each of which was exposed to only one mode of victim testimony and to one of the two styles of victim presentation. 20 tables, 19 figures, 48 references, and 6 appendixes with statistical tables and details on methodology
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Foreign criminal justice research; Jury decisionmaking; Jury research; Sexual assault; Sexual assault victims; Testimony; Video taped testimony
Note: AIC Research and Public Policy Series, No. 68.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.