skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 214654 Find in a Library
Title: Keystones for Reform: Promising Juvenile Justice Policies and Practices in Pennsylvania
Author(s): Neelum Aryna; Eric Lotke; Liz Ryan; Marc Schindler; Dana Shoenberg; Mark Soler
Date Published: October 2005
Page Count: 60
Sponsoring Agency: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Chicago, IL 60603
Juvenile Law Ctr
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Sale Source: Juvenile Law Ctr
The Philadelphia Building
1315 Walnut Street, 4th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report describes a number of promising juvenile justice policies and practices in the State of Pennsylvania providing a solid base for further reform efforts.
Abstract: Reform efforts in Pennsylvania are focusing on bringing about change in three areas: the coordination of mental health and juvenile justice systems, the system of aftercare services and supports, and disproportionate minority contact with the juvenile justice system. Pennsylvania has initiated a number of policies and practices which show promise: (1) the Juvenile Court Judges Commission conducts research and training, develops and oversees compliance with standards and engages in legislative and policy analysis; (2) Act 148 and needs-based budgeting provides financial incentives for counties to keep young offenders at home, in their communities, and in least restrictive placements; (3) the Allegheny County Juvenile Court’s Community Intensive Supervision Program, a community focused alternative to incarceration; (4) use of evidence-based prevention and treatment practices, a variety of models that have been proven effective in extensive scientific research and are central treatment approaches; (5) use of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument used for screening incarcerated youth to identify needs for mental health assessment and treatment; and (6) detention population control at the Philadelphia Youth Study Center. Each section of this report describes the origins and implementation of the policies and procedures, lessons learned from the efforts, challenges for the future, and resources through which others can obtain more information.
Main Term(s): State juvenile justice systems
Index Term(s): Juvenile justice planning; Juvenile justice policies; Juvenile justice reform; Juvenile justice system; Pennsylvania
Note: Downloaded on June 27, 2006.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.