skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 241469 Find in a Library
Title: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission Youth Reentry Improvement Report
Corporate Author: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
United States of America
Date Published: November 2011
Page Count: 80
Sponsoring Agency: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
Springfield, IL 62701
Sale Source: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
815-823 East Monroe Street
Springfield, IL 62701
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report on the Illinois Juvenile Reentry Improvement Study contains data and data analysis pertinent to an assessment of Illinois’ juvenile release, reentry, and revocation systems.
Abstract: Regarding indeterminate sentencing and release decisionmaking, this report concludes that the current release decisionmaking process is inconsistent with Illinois’ indeterminate, rehabilitative juvenile justice laws. The Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission recommends that release processes be reformed so as to ensure that the Department of Juvenile Justice prepares youth for release and that the Prisoner Review Board increases the frequency and quality of release hearings. Regarding youth reentry, the Commission concludes that the current parole system uses an adult surveillance model that is inconsistent with best practices in juvenile reentry; therefore, the Commission recommends that the Department of Juvenile Justice Aftercare Specialist pilot program be expanded statewide to replace the adult parole model being used with youth. Regarding parole revocation and due process, the Commission concludes that the current parole revocation process is not objective and deprives youth of their constitutional due process rights; therefore, it is recommended that revocation decisions be based on appropriate criteria and should be made by courts under a due process regimen. Regarding the juvenile justice case management system, the Commission concludes that the current juvenile justice data system is not adequate for youth tracking, case planning, and monitoring system outcomes. This report recommends that the State develop a case management and data system. 12 appendixes present materials, forms, and data pertinent to this report.
Main Term(s): Juvenile Aftercare
Index Term(s): Case management; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness; Juvenile justice information systems; Juvenile parolees; Post-release programs; Reentry; Revocation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.