skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 248659 Find in a Library
Title: Closer to Home: An Analysis of the State and Local Impact of the Texas Juvenile Justice Reforms
Corporate Author: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
United States of America

Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University
United States of America
Date Published: January 2015
Page Count: 108
Sponsoring Agency: Annie E. Casey Foundation
Baltimore, MD 21202
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
New York, NY 10005
Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-4476
Grant Number: 2012-CZ-BX-K071
Sale Source: Council of State Governments Justice Ctr
100 Wall Street
20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The methodology and findings are presented for an evaluation of the impact of juvenile justice reforms mandated by the Texas Legislature beginning in 2007.
Abstract: This evaluation produced three key findings. First, State efforts to reduce the number of youth in State juvenile correctional facilities has enabled thousands more youth to live at home or be supervised closer to home. The State has saved hundreds of millions of dollars as a result of this reform, while ensuring that public safety is not compromised. Second, at the State and local levels, Texas is not achieving the full potential of its investment in community-based programs for youth under the supervision of juvenile probation departments. The likelihood of juvenile probationers being re-arrested did not decline between 2007 and 2012. This is a disappointing finding, since the State increased appropriations to county probation departments under the reform agenda. Improved training for probation officers and the upgrading of performance measures are recommended. Third, State and local officials in other States should be addressing the questions posed and answered in this report in their own jurisdictions; however, in many other jurisdictions, information systems are inadequate to measure the implementation and outcomes of reforms similar to those in Texas. 15 tables, 14 figures, and 64 endnotes
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice policies
Index Term(s): Alternatives to Incarceration; Alternatives to institutionalization; BJA Grant-related Documents; Community Corrections; Juvenile justice reform; Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=270762

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.