skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249182 Find in a Library
Title: Geometric Morphometric Validation Study of Computed Tomography–Extracted Craniofacial Landmarks
Journal: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery  Volume:25  Issue:1  Dated:January 2014  Pages:231-237
Author(s): Amanda R. Hale; Kenda K. Honeycutt; Ann H. Ross
Date Published: January 2014
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2005–MU–BX–K078
Document: HTML
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study investigated the variation between craniofacial landmarks extracted from computed tomographic (CT) scans and those collected from direct digitization of dry skulls.
Abstract: Thirteen traditional craniofacial landmarks were obtained from each CT scan using the coordinate option in the software Aviso. These coordinates were then compared with the coordinates digitized directly from the dry skulls as two separate samples and individually. Similarities were found between the two coordinate samples, with the first principal component representing only 23.97 percent of the total variation associated with the data acquisition methods, and were found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0223). Differences were more prevalent along the midline landmarks. In contrast, the individual specimen comparisons exhibited the largest amount of variation within the symmetric landmarks with the bilateral landmarks that were more medially located in the CT sample, but no individual specimens were significantly different (e.g., P = 0.9883) when comparing both data acquisition modalities. The bilateral coordinates were not found to be significantly different for either analysis (P = 0.4165). The significant differences found for the entire data set suggest that the combination of CT-extracted and digitized individuals needs to be further explored with respect to the reference frames and sample composition; however, the individual specimen comparison results of this study validate the utility of CT-extracted landmarks when used for putative identifications in a forensic setting and when clinically applied. (Publisher abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Technology transfer
Index Term(s): Bone analysis; Comparative analysis; Data collection devices; Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Performance Measures; Testing and measurement; Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.