skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249185 Find in a Library
Title: Elder Abuse Computerized Decision Support System
Author(s): Kendon J. Conrad
Date Published: September 2015
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2011-IJ-CX-0014
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Report (Technical); Test/Measurement
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This project field-tested the implementation and performance of the Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS) as a means of improving the reporting, assessments, and interventions in elder abuse cases processed in six Illinois agencies compared to standard protocols, and it estimated the psychometric properties of EADSS measures of abuse, neglect, and exploitation in such cases.
Abstract: The field-test results supported the hypothesis that use of the EADSS will result in higher substantiation rates (“”verified” or “some indication”) than the current system of assessment known as ANE (Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation). The ANE substantiation rate was 13.6-percent lower than the substantiation rate of the EADSS (46.6 percent compared to 60.2 percent). The EADSS rate was particularly higher for sexual abuse than the ANE system. The report attributes this improved substantiation rate to EADSS’ assessment for all types of abuse, regardless of whether it was alleged by the reporter. A focus group with the IT staff reached a consensus that the EADSS could be improved by being a stand-alone system designed specifically to support the work of Adult Protective Services. The name for this stand-alone system was changed from EADSS to AADSS (Adult Abuse Decision Support System). This change occurred as of July 2013. The project examined all of the dimensional measures of the EADSS for the cases that were substantiated. This report briefly summarizes those measures that reached or exceeded the criteria for a useful dimensional measure, followed by a discussion of the measures that did not reach the criteria. The measures of abuser risk met the criteria for reliability and unidimensionality.
Main Term(s): Elderly victims
Index Term(s): Adult Protective Services; Automation; Case processing; Comparative analysis; Crime detection; Decisionmaking; Elder Abuse; Information Systems and Technology; NIJ final report; NIJ Resources; Performance Measures; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.