skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 249367 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Laser Diode Thermal Desorption-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LDTD-MS-MS) in Forensic Toxicology
Journal: Journal of Analytical Toxicology  Volume:38  Issue:8  Dated:October 2014  Pages:528-535
Author(s): N.D. Bynum; K.N. Moore; M. Grabenauer
Date Published: October 2014
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-R2-CX-K004
Document: HTML
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study used laser diode thermal desorption-tandem mass spectrometry (LDTD-MS-MS) to validate 48 compounds in drug-free human urine and blood for screening or quantitative analysis.
Abstract: Many forensic laboratories experience backlogs due to increased drug-related cases. Laser diode thermal desorption (LDTD) has demonstrated its applicability in other scientific areas by providing data comparable with instrumentation, such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, in less time. In the current study, the performance of LDTD-MS-MS was determined by evaluating carryover, interference, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, matrix effect, linearity, precision, and accuracy and stability. Quantitative analysis indicated that LDTD-MS-MS produced precise and accurate results with the average overall within-run precision in urine and blood represented by a %CV <14.0 and <7.0, respectively. The accuracy for all drugs in urine ranged from 88.9 to 104.5 percent and 91.9 to 107.1 percent in blood. Overall, LDTD has the potential for use in forensic toxicology; however, before it can be successfully implemented, there are some challenges that must be addressed. Although the advantages of the LDTD system include minimal maintenance and rapid analysis (~10 s per sample), which makes it ideal for high-throughput forensic laboratories, a major disadvantage is its inability or difficulty in analyzing isomers and isobars due to the lack of chromatography without the use of high-resolution MS; therefore, it would be best implemented as a screening technique. (Publisher abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Drug analysis
Index Term(s): Crime laboratory management; Efficiency; Forensics/Forensic Sciences; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Poisons and poison analysis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=271511

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.