skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249471 Find in a Library
Title: Do Cellmates Matter? A Study of Prison Peer Effects Under Essential Heterogeneity
Author(s): Heather M. Harris
Date Published: November 2015
Page Count: 501
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2013-IJ-CX-0043
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Dissertation/Thesis; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effect of prison peers in a U.S. adult prison population, using a unique dataset compiled from the administrative databases of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections.
Abstract: The primary goal of this study was to determine whether, rather than how, interactions with cellmates influence the reoffending of prison inmates. More specifically, the study examined whether criminogenic cellmate associations can be causally implicated in the prevalence of the reoffending of the male members of a first-time release cohort from the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Both criminological theory and statistical methods inform the analysis. The underlying process being modeled in the current study is a decision. That decision is whether or not two inmates should cell together. Celling decisions might be made by inmates who request cellmates, by correctional officers who assign inmates to cells, or by counselors who recommend inmates for particular prison programs that require particular cell assignments. The study found little support for the hypothesis that social interaction between cellmates can account for the average criminogenic effects of prison peer interaction on reoffending outcomes. The longest-duration cellmate associations maintained by the members of a release cohort from the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections were examined to determine whether the prior criminal experience and criminality of the cellmates would influence the reoffending outcome of the releasees, who spent varying amounts of time with their longest-duration cellmates. On average, no consistent significant associations were found between duration of cellmate association and the releasees’ reoffending outcomes. Outcomes included both rearrest and recidivism. On the other hand, there was considerable evidence of marginal prison peer effects; substantial “essential heterogeneity” remained despite the inclusion of numerous statistical controls. 14 tables, 97 figures, extensive references, and appended supplementary information
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Inmate society relations; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Peer influences on behavior; Prisonization; Recidivism causes; Social conditions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.