skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249687 Find in a Library
Title: Model Programs Guide Literature Review: Afterschool Programs
Series: OJJDP Model Programs Guide Literature Reviews
Corporate Author: Development Services Group, Inc.
United States of America
Date Published: October 2010
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: Development Services Group, Inc.
Bethesda, MD 20814
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-MU-FX-K001
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Literature Review; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on a literature review, this report identifies the evaluation outcomes for after-school programs (ASPs).
Abstract: ASPs generally occur outside of mandated school hours, although some programs classified as ASPs may be part of a larger program composed of elements delivered during school hours. Most current ASPs have one of three purposes that may not be mutually exclusive: improve students’ academic performance, prevent problem behaviors from developing, and encourage positive youth development. One of the emerging aspects of evaluations of ASPs is the identification of program characteristics that make them most effective; however, research over the first decade of the 21st century has been divided between studies that emphasize the positive effect of ASPs and reviews that argue the research methods of most ASP evaluations are so weak that only preliminary conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of ASPs. This paper discusses the limitations of current ASP evaluation research and research results. Regarding the latter issue, several of the largest, most rigorous evaluations have found a mix of small positive effects, no effects, or small negative effects. Some positive effects of ASPs have included elementary school students feeling safer and parent reports of improved school attendance. Overall, however, the outcomes were disappointing. Moreover, there was evidence of higher levels of negative behavior (e.g., school suspensions and students being disciplined by teachers). Confirmation about the overall effectiveness of ASPs awaits more rigorous research. In the meantime, there is a group of programs, notably those that incorporate evidence-based approaches, that are available for replication. 22 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): Effectiveness of crime prevention programs; Evidence-Based Programs; Evidence-Based Research; Extracurricular Activities; OJJDP grant-related documents; OJJDP Resources; School-Based Programs; Services effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.