skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249717 Find in a Library
Title: Model Programs Guide Literature Review: Formal, Post-Adjudication Juvenile Probation Services
Series: OJJDP Model Programs Guide Literature Reviews
Corporate Author: Development Services Group, Inc.
United States of America
Date Published: August 2017
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: Development Services Group, Inc.
Bethesda, MD 20814
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-MU-FX-K001
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Literature Review; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Report (Technical Assistance); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on a literature review, this paper discusses the features and effectiveness of three types of juvenile probation: traditional probation, intensive supervision programs, and school-based probation.
Abstract: “Traditional probation” places youth on informal/voluntary or formal/court-ordered supervision. It typically sets rules for the probationers that are intended to limit risky behaviors related to their offenses. Probationer behaviors are monitored through regular contact visits with probation officers. Evaluations of the effectiveness of traditional juvenile probation have not been encouraging. They have noted that the limited monitoring of probationers by overworked probation officers has little influence on juvenile probationers’ behavior, particularly juveniles with a history of problem behaviors. “Intensive supervision programs“ differ from traditional probation in providing for smaller caseloads that allow more frequent contacts between probation officers and their clients, as well as more strict responses to probation violations. In addition, intensive supervision typically includes the delivery of a wide range of services that address probationer needs identified by an assessment procedure. The evaluation literature on intensive probation supervision is mixed and inconclusive; however, there is some evidence that this type of probation delivered with treatment services has reduced recidivism. “School-based probation“ involves a partnership between juvenile probation departments and local schools. Probation officers are located within the school, so as to increase the frequency of contact between probation officers and their clients. Probationers who engage in school-related problem behaviors are immediately referred to their probation officers. Although no comprehensive evaluation has been completed on school-based probation, preliminary evidence suggests it has a positive impact on school attendance, school conduct, and recidivism. 22 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile probation
Index Term(s): Intensive juvenile probation; Juvenile probation effectiveness; Juvenile probation services; Juvenile probationers; OJJDP grant-related documents; OJJDP Resources; School based probation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.