skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 249779 Find in a Library
Title: SMART Watch Dispatch, March 2015
Journal: SMART Watch Dispatch  Dated:March 2015  Pages:1-2
Date Published: March 2015
Page Count: 2
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART)
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Technical Assistance
Format: Document (Online); News/Media
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This issue discusses the implications of the court case of State v. Shale (Supreme Court of the State of Washington, 2015), in which Howard Shale appealed his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender.
Abstract: Although Shale registered as a sex offender in King County, WA, after his release from Federal prison where he served his sentence for raping a child under 12, he lived with his extended family members on the lands of the Quinault Indian Reservation, which is in Jefferson County, WA, where he failed to register as a sex offender. His defense at trial was that as an enrolled member of an Indian Tribe whose offense was committed in Indian Country, he was not subject to the criminal jurisdiction of the State court. Upon appeal, the Washington State Supreme Court held that even though Shale was a member of a federally recognized tribe (Yakama Nation) and his crimes were committed wholly on the lands of the Quinault Indian Reservation, because he was not on the lands of the tribe of which he is a member, he is subject to State criminal jurisdiction and could also be subject to a (Quinault) tribal charge for failure to register as a sex offender. The SMART Office encourages Washington State and its Indian tribes to work together in making sure that sex offenders in the State are given clear guidance as to State and tribal sex offender registration and notification codes.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Jurisdiction; Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART); Sex Offender Registration; State courts; Tribal Courts; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=271926

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.