skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 249881 Find in a Library
Title: Promoting Officer Integrity Through Early Engagements and Procedural Justice in the Seattle Police Department
Author(s): Emily G. Owens; David Weisburd; Geoffrey Alpert; Karen L. Amendola
Date Published: May 2016
Page Count: 149
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0009
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Findings and methodology are reported for an evaluation of an innovative police training program intended to promote the Seattle Police Department’s (SPD’s) officers’ use of procedural justice.
Abstract: Procedural justice implemented by officers follows the LEED model of interaction with citizens. LEED is an acronym for “listen and explain with equity and dignity.” This model of interaction by police with persons involved in a computer-assisted dispatch (CAD) event requires that the officer listen to the involved parties’ questions and answers; explain why police intervention is warranted; be respectful of the rights, feelings, and dignity of involved persons; and explain clearly and respectfully how the officer is going to handle the situation prompting the (CAD). The SPD innovative officer training program in procedural justice had three components. First, it applied insights from criminology and statistics in developing a new kind of early intervention system called a “High Risk Circumstance” (HRC) model. This model identifies officers serving areas that place them at high risk for problematic citizen encounters that could involve assaults on officers, intoxicated persons, etc. In a second component, sergeants trained in the LEED model guide officers in implementing this model in officer-citizen encounters. A third program component provides experimental evidence of the positive impact of a procedural justice training program that links officer interactive techniques with incident outcomes. This evaluation of the use of the HRC and LEED models concludes that officers who had at least one meeting in which they reviewed with their supervisors how they approached relatively standard citizen encounters were less likely than non-participating (control) officers to engage in behaviors that reduced police legitimacy with the public. In addition, over the longer term, trained officers were less likely to be involved in use-of-force incidents; however, there was no evidence that officers in the training program were less likely than control officers to receive complaints from the public. 21 tables, 4 figures, and 57 references
Main Term(s): Police-citizen interactions
Index Term(s): NIJ final report; NIJ Resources; Police community relations; Police community relations programs; Police professionalism; Police training programs; Social skills training; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=272041

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.