skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249892 Find in a Library
Title: Responding to Fiscal Challenges in State Correctional Systems: A National Study of Prison Closings and Alternative Strategies
Author(s): Lois M. Davis
Date Published: May 2016
Page Count: 123
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2011-IJ-CX-0011
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical); Survey
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In order to understand how States have addressed fiscal pressures since the economic downturn that began in 2008, this study examined States’ recent financial situation in corrections, the types of correctional initiatives and policy changes instituted by States, why various strategies were selected and the challenges in implementing them, and the short-term impact of these changes on public safety and correctional expenditures.
Abstract: The results of the survey of State correctional administrators suggest that States closed a number of prisons during the financial decline; however, this primarily involved closures of local or private correctional centers rather than major State prison facilities. The most common reasons for closing a facility were to consolidate offender populations and close facilities with high operating costs. The case studies provided a clearer understanding of the effects of the various strategies adopted by six States at the system level and facility level.. The ease and success of closing facilities and relocating staff was dependent on the degree to which a department had sufficient time to plan for closures, to work with staff and unions in facilitating relocation, to hold job vacancies in anticipation of closures, and to ensure timely release of information about closures. States were most successful when the Department of Corrections created a prison closure team to coordinate closures and examine lessons learned so as to improve subsequent closures. It was also import to mitigate the impact on staff and inmates. The effort to keep low-level offenders out of the prison system resulted in a concentration of serious and violent offenders in prison populations. This created inmate management problems. In addition, shortfalls in inmate medical services posed constitutional issues regarding the care and safety of inmates. Extensive figures
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Change management; Corrections costs; Cost/Benefit Analysis; Cutback management; NIJ final report; NIJ Resources; State correctional facilities
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.