skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 250245 Find in a Library
Title: From the Acting Director: Findings of the 2007 Forensic Evidence NIJ-Funded Survey
Journal: Police Chief  Volume:77  Dated:April 2010  Pages:20-21
Author(s): Kristina Rose
Date Published: April 2010
Page Count: 2
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2007F_07165; 2008-DN-BX-0001
Document: HTML
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical); Survey
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The acting director of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Kristina Rose, reports on a NIJ-funded survey to determine the scope of backlogs of forensic evidence that has not been sent to a crime laboratory for analysis.
Abstract: The survey of just over 2,000 of the Nation’s police departments solicited information on the number of cases with stored evidence that had not yet been analyzed by a crime lab. Of the cases with untested evidence, 14 percent were open homicides; 18 percent involved rape allegations; and 23 percent were open cases of property crimes. A concern not addressed in the survey is how many of these open cases could be cleared or advanced based on lab analysis of the stored evidence. Regarding evidence retention policies, the survey found significant disparities across jurisdictions. Only 46 percent of the respondents said they had a policy that requires the preservation of biological evidence in cases in which the defendant was found guilty. Less than half of the agencies had a computerized information system capable of tracking their forensic evidence inventory. Recommendations based on survey findings include more training for police in the benefits and uses of forensic evidence; the creation or improvement of computerized systems for tracking and monitoring forensic evidence; standardizing evidence retention policies across the Nation; improving evidence storage capacity; and the development of a system-wide approach for improving coordination among the police, forensic lab, and the prosecutor’s office. NIJ is currently in a partnership with three jurisdictions to assist them in improving the movement of forensic evidence through the justice system. 1 table
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Chain of custody (evidence); Evidence; Evidence identification and analysis; Evidence preservation; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=272405

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.