skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250344 Find in a Library
Title: Identifying At-Risk Officers: Can It Be Done in Corrections?
Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:278  Dated:February 2017
Author(s): Jack Harne
Date Published: February 2017
Page Count: 3
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Technical Assistance); Report (Technical); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After reviewing some police agencies’ use of a performance management information system (PMIS) to identify officers at risk for poor performance or misconduct, this article reports on research that is testing a similar use of a PMIS to identify at-risk corrections officers.
Abstract: A PMIS as used by police agencies has three functions. First, it identifies any officers who may be at risk for poor performance or misconduct. Second, it provides the opportunity for at-risk officers to receive counseling, targeted training, or other corrective interventions. Third, it monitors identified officers’ post-intervention behavior and performance to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. The U.S. Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice (NIJ) sponsored research intended to determine whether such uses for a PMIS with corrections officers is feasible. The research team partnered with a Florida sheriff’s office to examine the application of a PMIS with jail corrections officers. Since the sheriff’s office supervises both law enforcement and corrections officers, this will enable researchers to compare and apply what is already known about the use of PMISs with law enforcement to their use with corrections officers. This article reports on the implementation of the research methodology and findings to date, and the steps that remain before the research is to be completed by early 2017. Data collection and interpretation challenges to date are discussed, along with the results thus far in identifying potential indicators for the identification of corrections officers at risk for poor performance and misconduct. Research in progress is focusing on the predictive accuracy of the prototype PMIS in identifying at-risk officers while avoiding flagging officers who do not need intervention.
Main Term(s): Corrections personnel evaluation
Index Term(s): Data analysis; Early intervention; Management Information Systems; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Performance Measures
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.