skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250486 Find in a Library
Title: Reforming Sentencing and Corrections Policy: The Experience of Justice Reinvestment Initiative States
Author(s): Samantha Harvell; Jeremy Welsh-Loveman; Hanna Love
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: December 2016
Page Count: 97
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Grant Number: 2015-ZB-BX-K005
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report updates the findings presented in the Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) State Assessment Report of January 2014 and summarizes what has happened in the 28 States that engaged in the JRI process between 2010 and 2016.
Abstract: The JRI was developed through a public-private partnership between the U.S. Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and The Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew). It was formally launched in 2010 to help States understand their correctional trends based on data collection and analysis and then develop and adopt policies and practices to improve the cost-effectiveness of the management of their corrections populations. Many States are still in the early stages of implementing JRI, so attempts to draw firm conclusions are premature; however, a review of participating States’ efforts shows that 2015 prison populations in just over half of the JRI States were below previously projected levels. Through 2016 , JRI States reported $1.1 billion in savings or averted costs attributable to JRI reforms. There has also been a shift toward prioritizing the collection and analysis of data that enables objective evaluations of the effectiveness of correctional policies and practices in reducing recidivism and achieving related objectives. Challenges remain, however, as some JRI States have experienced impediments in passing reform legislation or fully translating policy into practice. This report analyzes specific JRI efforts in amending sentencing laws, reforming pretrial practices, modifying prison release practices, strengthening community corrections, and ensuring sustainability of reforms. Also discussed are performance measurement and outcomes, as well as challenges and lessons learned. 12 figures, 4 tables, 135 notes, and approximately 50 references
Main Term(s): Correctional reform
Index Term(s): Alternatives to Incarceration; BJA Grant-related Documents; BJA Resources; Change management; Corrections effectiveness; Cost effectiveness analysis; Law reform; Sentencing reform; State criminal justice systems
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.