skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 250667 Find in a Library
Title: State Laws Related to Family Judges' and Custody Evaluators' Recommendations in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence: Final Summary Overview
Author(s): Daniel G. Saunders
Date Published: March 2017
Page Count: 47
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2014-IJ-CX-0018
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Grants and Funding; Legislation/Policy Analysis; Program/Project Description; Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study obtained information on the relationship between State family law statutes and professionals’ recommendations for child custody and visitation in cases involving intimate partner violence (IPV).
Abstract: Study samples consisted of 512 child custody evaluators and 200 judges from 46 States. Survey respondents were asked to make a custody recommendation for a case vignette of custody that involved serious IPV. In addition, evaluators indicated their history of actual recommendations in IPV cases. Eight child-custody laws were related to the custody-visitation outcomes. Under “friendly parent” laws, a standard for custody determination involved deciding which parents need to facilitate a good relationship between their children and the other parent. Only a small percentage of the many statistical relationships assessed were significant. When there were laws that exempted IPV cases from “friendly parent” standards, judges tended to favor victim-supportive outcomes, such as awarding sole custody to victims. These findings generally persisted when controlling for beliefs about IPV and custody, IPV knowledge acquisition, and background characteristics. In an analysis combining both samples, an overall outcome that favored the abuser was significantly higher in “friendly parent” States, even with the presence of laws that presumed the abuser should not have custody. All but eight States have “friendly parent” provisions, and only eight have exemptions for IPV. A policy implication of the findings is that States should consider repealing their “friendly parent” provisions or adding an exemption for IPV. Findings also support the expansion of IPV training for judges and evaluators. Generally, State laws did not predict the type of recommendation for supervised visits, primarily because the laws did not cover supervision; however, States with mandated IPV training for judges had evaluators who were more likely to recommend professional supervision of visits. Implications for future research are also discussed. 3 tables and 47 references
Main Term(s): Victims of violent crime
Index Term(s): Child custody; Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence; Family courts; Judicial attitudes; Judicial decisions; Judicial educational programs; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=272835

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.