skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250794 Find in a Library
Title: When a Cleared Rape Is Not Cleared: A Multilevel Study of Arrest and Exceptional Clearance
Journal: Journal of Interpersonal Violence  Volume:31  Issue:9  Dated:May 2016  Pages:1767-1792
Author(s): S. M. Walfield
Date Published: May 2016
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
Washington, DC 20531
Document: HTML
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Book Chapter; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Since rape remains one of the most underreported and least likely to be cleared of the violent crimes, it is of paramount importance to understand the factors associated with the likelihood of a case being cleared by law enforcement, so this study used data from the National Incident–Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), as well as a multilevel modeling approach to examine the relationship between victim, offender, incident, and police department characteristics, contrasting the two types of clearance: arrest and exceptional clearance.
Abstract: “Exceptional clearance” occurs due to reasons outside of law enforcement’s control and despite being considered cleared, the offender is not arrested, charged, nor turned over for prosecution. Of the 16,231 cleared rapes in 238 departments, nearly half (47 percent) resulted in exceptional clearance when the victim refused to cooperate or when prosecution was declined. Incident-level variables had a greater effect on the likelihood of exceptional clearance than victim and offender variables. The department explained a significant amount of variation in the dependent variable, as 37 percent of the variance in type of clearance was between-department variation. Implications for future research on exceptional clearance and NIBRS are discussed. 50 references (Publisher abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Criminal justice statistics
Index Term(s): BJS Grant-related Documents; Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS); Case processing; Clearance rates; Prosecutorial discretion; Prosecutorial screening; Rape investigations; Rape research; Rape statistics; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.