FIFTY RESPONDENTS, RANDOMLY SELECTED, WERE INTERVIEWED (BY TELEPHONE) FIRST ABOUT THEIR BELIEFS REGARDING THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ALONG THREE DIMENSIONS - CONTROL, RESPONSIBILITY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY. SECOND, THEY WERE ASKED TO CONSIDER WHETHER BEING LEGALLY DRUNK WHEN COMMITTING A VIOLENT CRIME CONSTITUTES A 'SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE' DESERVING OTHER THAN THE USUAL PENALTY. THREE OTHER POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE ALSO EXAMINED TO DETERMINE THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO DRUNKENNESS AS A SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE - PREMEDITATION, ALCOHOLISM, AND RECIDIVISM. TWO PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS ARE SUGGESTED: (1) IT APPEARS THAT MANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC STILL VIEW ALCOHOL ABUSE AS AN ASSOCIATED CRIMINAL OFFENSE, AND (2) RESPONDENTS' BELIEFS ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL DO NOT DEMONSTRATE A RATIONAL CONSISTENCY AS IT RELATES TO PENALTY JUDGMENTS CONCERNING VIOLENT CRIMES COMMITTED BY DRUNKEN INDIVIDUALS. THIS FINDING IS, IN PART, CONSISTENT WITH LINSKY'S EARLIER WORK. THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX. A LIST OF REFERENCES IS ALSO PROVIDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)