U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

ENTRAPMENT DEFENSE IN FEDERAL COURTS - EMERGENCE OF A LEGAL DOCTRINE

NCJ Number
36748
Journal
Mississippi Law Journal Volume: 47 Issue: 2 Dated: (APRIL 1976) Pages: 211-236
Author(s)
K M MURCHISON
Date Published
1976
Length
26 pages
Annotation
THIS ARTICLE TRACES THE CREATION AND DEFINITION OF THE FEDERAL COURT RESPONSE TO INTRUSIVE POLICE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS, WHICH DISALLOWED CONVICTION OF DEFENDANTS WHOSE CRIMINAL CONDUCT WAS INDUCED BY ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES.
Abstract
PRE-PROHIBITION CASES WHICH TENTATIVELY RECOGNIZED THE ENTRAPMENT DEFENSE, PARTICULARLY IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT, ARE DISCUSSED, ALONG WITH FIVE APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS BETWEEN 1920 AND 1925 WHICH ACTUALLY REVERSED LOWER COURT CONVICTIONS. THIS INCREASED ACCEPTANCE OF THE DEFENSE IS FURTHER REFLECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT'S RECOGNITION, AND RESTRICTION OF ENTRAPMENT IN ITS 1932 RULING IN SORRELLS V. UNITED STATES. ON APPEAL, THE COURT AFFIRMED THE EXISTENCE OF THE DEFENSE AND THE PRACTICES OF SUBMITTING THE QUESTION TO THE JURY AND ALLOWING THE PROSECUTION TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE OF THE DEFENDANT'S PRIOR CHARACTER AND CRIMINAL RECORD. HOWEVER, BY RELYING ON NARROW PRINCIPLES OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION, THE COURT ALSO LIMITED THE DOCTRINE'S APPLICABILITY TO THE INSTANT SITUATION, I.E., THE EIGHTEENTH AMENDMENT.

Downloads

No download available

Availability