U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

PERSONALITY AND CRIMINALITY (FROM CRIME IN SOCIETY, 1978, BY LEONARD D SAVITZ AND NORMAN JOHNSTON - SEE NCJ-53552)

NCJ Number
53556
Author(s)
D J TENNENBAUM
Date Published
1978
Length
10 pages
Annotation
THE FINDINGS OF SCHUESSLER AND CRESSEY (1950) AND WALDO AND DINITZ (1967) ARE UPDATED IN THIS REVIEW OF THE TRENDS IN LITERATURE FROM 1967 TO 1975 ATTEMPTING TO CORRELATE CRIMINALITY AND PERSONALITY.
Abstract
THE PRIMARY SOURCES USED FOR THE REVIEW WERE 'PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS' AND 'CRIME AND DELINQUENCY ABSTRACTS' FOR ARTICLES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1967 AND 1975. ONLY DATA THAT COMPARED A DELINQUENT OR CRIMINAL POPULATION TO A CONTROL (NONCRIMINAL) POPULATION WERE USED. EMPLOYING STRINGENT CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION, THE COMPARISONS SHOW REMARKABLY SIMILAR RESULTS TO WALDO AND DINITZ' OVERALL FINDING THAT APPROXIMATELY 80 PERCENT OF THE STUDIES SHOW DIFFERENCES IN CRIMINAL AND NONCRIMINAL GROUPS. SCORES ON THE FOLLOWING PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS WERE COMPARED FOR THE TWO GROUPS: ACTIVITY VECTOR ANALYSIS, THE CALIFORNIA PSYCHOLOGICAL INVENTORY, DOWNEY-WILL TEMPERAMENT TESTS, THE GOODENOUGH DRAWING TEST, THE JUNIOR EYSENCK PERSONALITY INVENTORY, THE MACHOVER DRAW-A-PERSON TEST, THE SWEET PERSONAL ATTITUDES TEST, AND THE TELENOMIC TRENDS INSTRUMENT. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT WITH THE ATTEMPT TO TRY NEW AND DIFFERENT TESTS DURING THE PERIOD FROM 1967 TO 1975, IT IS DISCONCERTING TO FIND THAT PERSONALITY TESTS, PER SE, ARE NOT BETTER PREDICTORS OF CRIMINAL PERSONALITIES NOW THAN THEY WERE 10 YEARS AGO. AS SOME PRACTITIONERS ARE SUGGESTING, THERE INDEED MAY BE A 'CRIMINAL PERSONALITY,' BUT THIS MAY BE SUCH A COMPLEX ENTITY THAT EXISTING TESTING PROCEDURES ARE NOT REFLECTING THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CRIMINALS AND NONCRIMINALS; THE MAJORITY OF TESTING ALLOWS FOR MORE DIFFERENCES TO BE FOUND WITHIN GROUPS OF CRIMINALS AND NONCRIMINALS THAN BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS. ESSENTIALLY, THE DATA DO NOT REVEAL ANY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CRIMINAL AND NONCRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY BECAUSE MOST RESULTS ARE BASED ON TAUTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. THE CONCLUSION REMAINS THAT CURSORY PERSONALITY TESTING HAS NOT DIFFERENTIATED BETWEEN CRIMINALS AND NONCRIMINALS. REFERENCES AND TABULAR DATA ARE INCLUDED. (KBL)

Downloads

No download available

Availability