U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

CONDUCTING EVALUATIVE RESEARCH AND IMPLEMENTING ITS RESULTS - DILEMMAS FOR BOTH ADMINISTRATORS AND RESEARCHERS

NCJ Number
53959
Journal
International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice Volume: 2 Issue: 1 Dated: (SPRING/SUMMER 1978) Pages: 15-28
Author(s)
D SZABO; S RIZKALLA
Date Published
1978
Length
14 pages
Annotation
THE THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF EVALUATION, PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTING EVALUATION RESULTS, AND PARTICULAR PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE INSTITUTIONS ARE DISCUSSED.
Abstract
DISCUSSION OF A VARIETY OF DEFINITIONS OF EVALUATION REVEALS THAT EVALUATIVE RESEARCH HAS SEVERAL FACETS WHICH CONCERN ITS OWN OBJECTIVES AS WELL AS ITS CONTENT OR THE FUNCTIONS IT CAN FULFILL. POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO EVALUATIVE RESEARCH ARE DISCUSSED UNDER THE FOLLOWING MODELS: (1) THE GOAL ATTAINMENT MODEL, WHICH PLACES EMPHASIS ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE DEGREE OF SUCCESS OR FAILURE ENCOUNTERED BY THE PROGRAM IN REACHING PREDETERMINED OBJECTIVES; (2) THE SYSTEM MODEL, WHICH PLACES EMPHASIS ON MEASURING THE DEGREE TO WHICH AN ORGANIZATION REALIZES ITS GOALS UNDER A GIVEN SET OF CONDITIONS; AND (3) HARD VERSUS SOFT DATA, WHICH STRESSES THE QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF EVALUATION. THERE IS A NEED TO DEVISE MORE EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG EVALUATORS, AGENCY ADMINISTRATORS, AND POLICYMAKERS IN THE PROMOTION OF CONTINUOUS RESEARCH. IN EXAMINING THIS ISSUE, THE STUDY EXPLORES REASONS WHY A LACK OF COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG EVALUATORS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND POLICYMAKERS HAS PREVAILED UP TO THE PRESENT, AND SOLUTIONS ARE SUGGESTED THAT WILL CREATE A FAVORABLE CLIMATE FOR RESEARCH AND IMPROVE COOPERATION BETWEEN ADMINISTRATORS AND RESEARCHERS. IN DISCUSSING PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTING EVALUATION RESULTS, TWO SETS OF FACTORS ARE IDENTIFIED WHICH ACCOUNT FOR THE NONUTILIZATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS: (1) FACTORS LINKED WITH THE ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS THAT ARE EXPECTED TO USE THE EVALUATION RESULTS AND (2) FACTORS LINKED WITH THE CURRENT STATE OF EVALUATION PRACTICE. WAYS OF DEALING WITH THESE FACTORS ARE SUGGESTED. PARTICULAR PROBLEMS RELATED TO IMPLEMENTING THE RESULTS OF EVALUATION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AS A PUBLIC SERVICE INSTITUTION ARE CONSIDERED. A REASONABLE DEGREE OF CONSENSUS ON GOALS MUST BE ACHIEVED AMONG THE VARIOUS AGENCIES IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA IF THE RESULTS OF EVALUATION ARE TO BE IMPLEMENTED. REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED.